Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Restaurant Business and Reasons Why People Eat Out
Food is one of the crucial and basic necessities that must be satisfied on a daily basis for human survival. This creates demand for food which in turn leads to the existent of restaurant and other food offering services. In this paper, we will discuss the factors that determine whether to eat out, choosing where to eat and whether to return to the restaurant in the future.Advertising We will write a custom book review sample on Restaurant Business and Reasons Why People Eat Out specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The reasons why people eat out are social and psychological. Some of the reasons include; to meet a person, enjoy, party, relax and to have something different from home. The main cause for dining out in most occasions is to get fast foods. Financial ability and time availability are also important factors that must be considered when making a decision to dine out. It is cheaper to eat at home than go out. Restaurant busine ss deal with both tangible and intangible products and these is what determines success in the industry. Food is a tangible product and it has effect on customer satisfaction in the manner it is cooked and served. If the customer finds the food to be delicious, it will be obvious he or she would want to return to the restaurant in the future. On the other hand if the food is not good according to the customerââ¬â¢s remarks then it is likely that he or she will not return. Customer treatment and a favorable environment to enjoy and have a good time are the intangible factors that affect customer satisfaction and the decision to return. In conclusion, food quality and services offered in a restaurant are the key factors that determine if the customer will eat out, where to eat and whether to return. Investors in the restaurant industry should therefore, take these factors into consideration to ensure efficiency and success in their operations. Works Cited Walker, John Introduction to Hospitality. Upper Saddle River: Publisher Prentice Hall Higher Education, 2008. Comment:Advertising Looking for book review on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The decision making issue is well explained as well as the reason to eat out. The intangible definition is not well described as the student states it as the decision making aspect. An intangible is a product that cannot be physically touched it is only felt emotionally, physically or socially. These intangibles include customer treatment and enjoyment felt after consumption. I agree with the point on attractiveness of the environment as this will greatly influence the decision to eat in a restaurant and whether to return in the future. When excellent services are offered financial and distant constraints are always overlooked. This book review on Restaurant Business and Reasons Why People Eat Out was written and submitted by user Deborah Vega to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.
Saturday, November 23, 2019
Project Management-Chapter 8 Review Questions Essay Example
Project Management Project Management-Chapter 8 Review Questions Paper Project Management-Chapter 8 Review Questions Paper How does resource scheduling tie to project priority? -resource scheduling is directly tied to the project priority, because of the amount of available resources. The resources available will automatically go towards the project with the highest priority assigned by the organizationââ¬â¢s objectives. 2. How does resource scheduling reduce flexibility in managing projects? -Resource scheduling will reduce the flexibility because the scheduling system will reduce slack in increasing the number of critical and near-critical activities. . Present six reasons scheduling resources is an important task. oIt allows the project manager check to see if the resource is adequate and to assess the availability of resource. oIt allows the PM to consider possible alternatives for limited resources oIt allows multiple projects to be worked on at the same time, even if they are utilizing some or all of the same resources needed. oIt allows PMââ¬â¢s to see how much flexibility they have with man aging certain resources. Will help see if the project is assigned a realistic time line oIt will allow the PM to see which resources have priority 4. How can outsourcing project work alleviate the three most common problems associated with multiproject resource scheduling? -Outsourcing is a great way to improve the utilization of limited resources and make sure the project is running smoothly and efficiently and reduce bottlenecks. 5. Explain the risks associated with leveling resources, compressing or crashing projects, and imposed durations or ââ¬Å"catch-upâ⬠as the project is being implemented. The risks associated with leveling resources, compressing or crashing projects, and imposed durations are if flexibility is decreased and the risk of project delay is increased. 6. Why is it critical to develop a time- phased baseline? -It is important to develop a time-phased budget because they are critical to having a reliable project schedule. Other systems wonââ¬â¢t allow the PM to measure the amount of work completed or manage resources as well.
Thursday, November 21, 2019
Public Opinion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words
Public Opinion - Essay Example Therefore public opinion has become a valuable aspect of governance. In this case the evolution of technology and more democratic forms of govern which has kept the upholding of the right of individual has seen a dramatic evolution in giving of information to all people. One of the recent developments in the public opinion arena has been the opinion polls that have been used to give various information or views of the public on certain issues. They have been successful use in political pundits, market researches, national government agendas, and in other areas. Sociologists have relied on opinion polls in order to determine the success or failure of an event based on the views of the public. However opinion polls and other public view are contested notion that are likely to change overnight depending on what will be happening next. (Entman and Herbst 2001, P. 242; McCombs 2004, p. 63) The development of public opinion can be traced to many years ago during the time of Greek civilization. The quest on the nature of public opinion was first expressed by Plato who was a great Greek philosopher and who made immense contribution to the modern body of knowledge. From Plato the quest for the nature of public opinion can then be traced back to Herbamans and later to Bourdieu who seemed to contest the ability to have public opinion. Let us focus on the view of Bourdieu on public opinion and why he contested the existence of public opinion. The expression of the nature of public opinion according to Bourdieu can be traced to what he wrote in his book. He asserted the "the politician who yesterday said 'God is on our side' today says 'public opinion is on our side'". (Bourdieu 1979, pg. 125) According to Bourdieu, he was criticizing the notion that political have a way of relying on the views of the public which is done solely for source of support. In this case he was trying to show that the power of the politicians if vested in the people. The public have more power and control of the political situation in a state rather than the politician. This can also be attributed to what Aristotle referred to as a weak king when he asserted that a king who lost support of the public opinion should not be regarded as a king any more. In this case it is clear that the modern understanding of democracy and the politics can be taken in a way that political power should be vested on the people and should be responsibility of the people and their opinions. But the way Bourdieu compared political power with God detest the power of the public opinion. Bourdieu views public opinion as a manufactured consent and not as a traditional ways of research that can be used to give accurate information on something. He argued that public opinion in the form that is implemented is used in survey and poll is not efficient and does not exist. In this case he showed that opinion polls are used by those in power as a political instrument that legitimize their actions. They are relations of forces and tension and therefore they cannot be described as a percentage in any way. In his criticism of the polls, Bourdieu asserts that each and every one of use has an opinion that can be given on an idea. He stressed that all the
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)